Yesterday’s cooking contests used to be 4-H cookie bake-offs at the county fair. Today’s cooking contests have Iron chefs being broadcast globally on TV specials. Tomorrow’s cooking contests will be an Olympic sport. An apron-wearing Betty Crocker look-alike will run into Olympic stadium with the Olympic torch. As she reaches the pinnacle and reaches the torch out to light the Olympic flame, it will be in the shape of a large grill that signals the beginning of the Hamburger Cook-off event.
To watch the crazy number of cooking competition TV shows or read the crazy number of websites on cooking contests, you might come away with the idea that winning a cooking contest is all about the recipe and ingredients. Not so. If you think this, you’re cooking with one hand tied behind your back. The best cook doesn’t always win, and the best recipe doesn’t always win. If you understand what the judges are going through as they taste and judge, you can use three teaspoons of psychology to increase the chance that you Bring Home the Gold. Most cooking competitions and bake-offs and recipe contests don’t have Bobby Flay or French chefs judging them. Most have either a judging panel of amateur cooks, or they are judged by popular vote. In either of the last two cases, the judges are trying all – or at least many – of the entries. This means that they are starting to get a little bored and the entries are starting to taste an awful lot the same. Here’s what you can do. Use Taste Contrast. After tasting eleven versions of the same pasta, sensory-specific satiety sets in, and pasta starts tasting monotonous. You win by making your recipe stand out in contrast from the others, and you win by having contrast – taste contrast and texture contrast – within your own recipe. A chili that stands out by adding some steak chunks along with the hamburger, has a taste contrast compared to other chilis. One that uses onion that’s cut into large long pieces (instead of diced), makes every bite stand out in contrast to the next. Use Visual Contrast. At Le Cordon Bleu in Paris, they say “You taste first with your eyes.” If it looks great, the judges are thinking it’s going to taste great. By including colorful or high contrasting colors or shapes, it makes it look less boring compared the previous 11 things they just tried. The pasta recipe that uses with two kinds or pasta, black olive slices, two types of meat, and a broiler-browned top is going to look a lot more award-winning than the 11 family recipe spaghettis they just tasted. Give it the Right Name. Tables full of eating psychology research show that you taste what you expect you’ll taste. If someone says something is sweet, you start focusing on what’s sweet about the food. If they say something is creamy, it seems to taste creamier to you. You can make your Olympic entry look good by having it in a nice dish and making it look great (using contrast like browning, parsley, or whatever). You can also give it a name that evokes what you want people to taste. Calling your favorite dessert entry “Sugar Cookies” won’t be doing you a favor, but calling them “Vanilla Sugar Cookies” (because you put a drop of vanilla in the recipe) just raised the Las Vegas betting average that you’ll place higher in the sugar cookie race. If you’re interested in how this might look in action. Here’s an example. There was a Casserole Cook-off at our mini-country fair this week. Being from the Midwest, I love casseroles. We were going to go to the fair that Saturday to ride on carnival rides, and my daughters said, “You should make something for the casserole contest.’ Step 1. Grab Ingredients. I took a basic boring crab casserole recipe off the internet, and defrosted about $3 worth of fake crab meat from the freezer. I grabbed other stuff from the cupboards that would give it taste contrast or visual contrast. Step 2. Add Taste Contrast. I figured the judges would be eating lots of casseroles with pasta, rice, or potatoes as the starch. I wanted to this to stand out a different. I substituted soft bread cubes and sliced hard-boiled eggs instead of the pasta. Then I put a cup of celery in it gave each bite taste contrast. I would have sautéed garlic, but I didn’t think of it until I was backing out of the garage. Step 3. Add Visual Contrast. Sliced black olives – in the shape of rings – would have it some nice contrast. Not everyone likes black olives, but they would be worth the risk. I also finished the casserole off under the broiler to brown it for contrast. Step 4. Give it the Right Name. Instead of calling it Crab Casserole, I called it “Crab-a-gonza Casserole” which was silly given that there’s no actual crab in the recipe. To take the silliness over the top, I put a little crab icon next to the name, and printed out a color name plate, in case they put the descriptions in front of entry (which they ended up doing). Step 5. Collect Your Prize. This prize was larger than the first kitchen I had. There are a lot of other ideas you can use, but these will get you started on your journey to bring home the gold. If you’re looking for ideas that work well for names or how to turn your comfort foods into cash and prizes, I’ve included the links to some scientific articles – including one called “Engineering Comfort Foods.” [They are a bit detailed and boring, so don’t read them while driving or operating heavy machinery.]
0 Comments
I was recently asked what were some of the measurable outcomes of the Smarter Lunchroom program. Here's what I sent them.
Top-Line Summary • 18% calorie reduction (Cohen et al., 2015). • .3-point decrease in obesity (Ickovics et al., 2019). • 20-27% less food waste (Williamson et al., 2016). • Projected $1.1 billion in health care savings over 10 years (Gortmaker et al., 2015). • Benefit-to-cost ratio of 4.2:1 (California Dept Ed, 2018). The Smarter Lunchrooms Movement (SLM), which was launched in 2009 Cornell University (2009-2017), applies principles of behavioral economics to nudge students toward healthier food choices without restricting options. While the program's approach of making small environmental changes in cafeterias seems intuitively beneficial, stakeholders rightfully demand evidence of concrete outcomes and measurable metrics of success. This report examines specific measurable changes in eating habits, reductions in obesity, and economic impacts resulting from SLM implementation. Impact on Obesity and Long-term Health Metrics While long-term obesity reduction studies are challenging due to the multiple factors influencing weight and the relatively recent widespread adoption of SLM, several studies have documented promising impacts:
Cost Effectiveness and Economic Impact The SLM approach stands out for its exceptional return on investment:
California Implementation Case Study California's statewide implementation of SLM offers compelling evidence of measurable success:
Conclusion The Smarter Lunchrooms Movement has demonstrated measurable, significant effects on student food selection and consumption patterns through rigorous scientific studies. While direct causal links to long-term obesity reduction are challenging to establish, the program has shown meaningful short-term impacts on caloric intake, nutritional quality, and economic outcomes. The evidence indicates that SLM is not merely encouraging habits that "might" extend into adulthood, but is creating immediate, measurable changes in eating behaviors that can contribute to healthier weight trajectories when implemented as part of comprehensive school wellness initiatives. Most importantly, SLM achieves these outcomes with minimal financial investment, making it among the most cost-effective nutrition interventions available to schools today. References California Department of Education. (2017). Smarter Lunchrooms Movement - Healthy eating & nutrition education. Retrieved from https://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/nu/he/smarterlunchrooms.asp California Department of Education. (2018). Team Nutrition Training Grant Final Report: Smarter Lunchrooms Movement of California. Cohen, J. F. W., Richardson, S., Parker, E., Catalano, P. J., & Rimm, E. B. (2015). Impact of the new USDA school meal standards on food selection, consumption, and waste. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(4), 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.013 Golub, M., Charlton, V., Kuester-Orr, H., Odabas, K., Fisk, C., & Fukagawa, N. (2019). School-level factors associated with implementing Smarter Lunchrooms in Pennsylvania. Journal of School Health, 89(8), 622-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12798 Gortmaker, S. L., Wang, Y. C., Long, M. W., Giles, C. M., Ward, Z. J., Barrett, J. L., Kenney, E. L., Sonneville, K. R., Sadaf Afzal, A., Resch, S. C., & Cradock, A. L. (2015). Three interventions that reduce childhood obesity are projected to save more than they cost to implement. Health Affairs, 34(11), 1932-1939. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0631 Goto, K., Waite, A., Wolff, C., Chan, K., & Giovanni, M. (2013). Do environmental interventions impact elementary school students' lunchtime milk selection? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35(2), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt004 Greene, K. N., Gabrielyan, G., Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2017). Fruit-promoting Smarter Lunchrooms interventions: Results from a cluster RCT. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.015 Hanks, A. S. (2017). Smarter Lunchroom principles are worth every penny: How simple lunchroom changes impact the school meal program bottom line. Journal of School Health, 87(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12461 Hanks, A. S., Just, D. R., & Brumberg, A. (2016). Marketing vegetables in elementary school cafeterias to increase uptake. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20151720. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1720 Hanks, A. S., Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2013). Smarter lunchrooms can address new school lunchroom guidelines and childhood obesity. Journal of Pediatrics, 166(4), 867-869. Just, D. R., & Wansink, B. (2009). Smarter lunchrooms: Using behavioral economics to improve meal selection. Choices, 24(3), 1-6. Ickovics, J. R., Duffany, K. O., Shebl, F. M., Peters, S. M., Read, M. A., Gilstad-Hayden, K. R., & Schwartz, M. B. (2019). Implementing school-based policies to prevent obesity: Cluster randomized trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56(1), e1-e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.026 Wansink, B. (2014). Slim by design: Mindless eating solutions for everyday life. New York: William Morrow. Williamson, D. A., Han, H., Johnson, W. D., Martin, C. K., & Newton, R. L. (2016). Modification of the school cafeteria environment can impact childhood nutrition: Results from the Wise Mind and LA Health studies. Appetite, 96, 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.037 |
Welcome!Here are some tips, tricks, and secrets on how you and your family can eat to be healthier and happier. They're based on over 30 years of our published research.
Fun InterviewsMost Visited Last MonthTop Downloads• Kitchen Makeover
• Smarter Lunchrooms • Smarter Lunchroom Scorecard • Grocery Shopping Hacks • Restaurant Secrets • Write a Useful Syllabus • Workplace Wellness Tips • Healthy Profitable Menus Categories
All
• For You
• Smarter Lunchrooms • The X'Plozionz Band • Help your family • Kitchen Scorecard • Retracted papers • Grocery secrets • Do kids inherit taste? • Be healthier at work • How not to retire • Estimating calories • Restaurant Secrets • Syllabus template Archives
April 2025
|